

Apts., Diversified, HealthCare, Hotels, Industrial, MH Parks, Offices, Retail (4), Storage, Specialty.
Comc'l,
Resd'l, Both
Constr.,
Developers, Hme Bldrs, Lodging, MH Mfgs, OnSite Tech, Resorts, Services, Tech, Timberland

See All
Stocks By Names &
Geog. & LOOKUP
Stock & Fund Prices &
Data
|




|
|
10-14-05
Vol. 8: No. 5 RealtyStocks'
Observer If you're not receiving this free
monthly e-newsletter, please register.
Monthly Feature:
The Impact of Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita Upon Real Estate and the Attack on Housing
A. Hurricane Katrina's & Rita's
Impact Upon Real Estate B. Housing Under Attack C.
Housing's Potential Negative Influence Upon REMFs &
REITs D. Equity REIT Performance E. Large Cap REIT Performance F. Mortgage REIT
Performance G. Realty Corporations G.
Real Estate Mutual Funds (REMFs)
A. HURRICANE KATRINA's & RITA's
IMPACT UPON REAL ESTATE The toll of Katrina has been especially tragic
for most residents of New Orleans and the coastal areas of Mississippi, as
well as the eastern portion of Texas near the Gulf Coast. Katrina has
displaced hundreds of thousands of people throughout other nearby states, and
some throughout the U.S. The human suffering and death from Katrina stunned
not only all Americans, but created sympathy worldwide.
Though it will take years to know the true impact of Katrina, and to a
lesser extent Rita, there are already various indications of the recent impact
these hurricanes have had upon real estate. Much of the impact is regional,
causing home values and the population in places like Baton Rouge to surge.
For those hotels/motels in the Gulf Coast not badly damaged and operational,
vacancies are scarce and rates have risen. Commercial activities for the
cities closest to the impacted areas have jumped for a variety of businesses
from beauty parlors to restaurants. Office occupancies and rates in places as
far away as Houston are showing improvement. However, the areas inland from
the Gulf of Mexico are not only reaping various benefits, but are also feeling
some strains. Student attendance in these other cities has increased
dramatically, causing the need for more classroom space and teachers. Traffic
has also increased, and the increased welfare and tax burden upon these other
cities is causing concerns.
The affects of
hurricanes Katrina and Rita are not only regional, but also national in scope.
Post Katrina, unemployment rose, manufacturing declined and jobless claims
jumped. The most obvious impact has been upon the increase in the price of
oil, natural gas and gasoline. The CPI released last week showed a jump of
1.2% of which 90% was attributable to the surge in energy costs. Though oil
prices have subsided recently, it may take a while for some major refineries
and pipe lines to be fully operational. With the onset of winter and energy
supply and delivery issues, DOE has indicated that the prices of natural gas
in much of the country over the coming months are likely to escalate about
50%. Furthermore, an early and harsh winter, could cause even higher increases
to occur. This will place an added cost burden upon homeowners and will also
increase operating costs for commercial buildings, particularly in colder
climates. Rising oil prices have also affected many construction products
requiring petroleum derivatives. Not only are such products becoming more
expensive, but the building needs in New Orleans and the Mississippi and Texas
coast are creating a much greater demand for these items. Reportedly plywood
has jumped about 25% in some areas of the country, which will cause home and
commercial construction costs to increase. In particular, rising material
costs could be most damaging among home builders who may have a difficult time
of passing these increased costs on to consumers as home values appear to be
stagnating in some areas. Top
B. HOUSING UNDER ATTACK Last
week, the President's Tax Panel recommended a zinger that could have negative
consequence upon residential real estate, especially in large coastal cities
like L.A., San Francisco, New York, D.C., Boston - as well as resort and
second home communities. This panel recommended reducing mortgage deductions
from the current $1 million limit to about $300,000. They also may decide to
recommend eliminating or reducing the mortgage limit applicable to second
homes and/or home equity loans. Obviously, such a proposal is expected to meet
much opposition from realtors, homeowners and other housing groups. However,
with the Federal deficit reaching it's third highest amount this past month,
the Federal Government needs to find ways to reduce deductions and increase
revenues.
Besides the threat of lower mortgage
deductions, it appears that even after an apparent slow down in the economy
due to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, that the Federal Reserve will continue to
raise the discount rate. They may not stop until it reaches more than 5%,
which was only 1% in June of last year. Though a 30-year fixed rate mortgage
may still hover around 6% and has only increased about .5 percent in recent
months, the short term interest only mortgage products and home equity loans
that were over 2% lower than fixed rate loans, are now near the same cost.
This is making it more difficult for people to qualify for home loans. Though
Chairman Greenspan indicates the main reason for rate increases is due to the
threat of inflation, possibly of equal importance is that higher rates are one
of the few real powers the Fed has made to slow down what they believe is an
overly speculative housing market.
The increase
cost of new construction and remodeling, as previously mentioned, is expected
to rise. This could further deter home purchases, especially if home prices
flatten or begin to decline. As the winter holidays approach, the home sales
activity traditionally slows. Thus, we are beginning to catch a seasonal
downturn. The cost to maintain a home could also increase dramatically this
winter with rising natural gas and oil costs. Consumer sentiment has dropped
dramatically over the past two months, which could further dampen not only
consumer sales, but also home sales.
Though past
predictions of a demise in home prices have been incorrect, and the housing
market has proven resilient, more negative housing influences are occurring.
Combined, the factors noted above are expected to significantly challenge the
housing industry for the coming year. We believe the main factor that will
start home prices to stagnate and fall, is when fixed rate mortgages pull away
from 6% and become a half-point higher or more. As we stated before, should
there be a rapid change in interest rate movement, and especially if long term
rates rise over 7%, we believe housing's golden goose will be cooked. What is
especially bothersome, is that by some accounts, over 40% of recent home
purchases have a down payment of less than 5%, and over 30% of all recent home
mortgages will be due within 5 years, or will have floating rates vulnerable
to significant increases. Though we still don't see an immediate "housing
bubble" bust, as long as any rate increases occurring in the next year or two
are modest, we do foresee a more stagnant housing market. Also, if rate
increases return to the levels that persisted throughout most of the 1990's,
significant value declines will occur and a troubled housing market could last
for several years or more. Top
C. THE HOUSING MARKET'S NEGATIVE INFLUENCE UPON REMFs and
REITs. Should the outlook for housing flatten or turn
negative, there is some concern that it may affect the performance of real
estate mutual funds (REMFs) and even public real estate investment trusts
(REITs). Though a few REMFs have positions in Home Builders, most REMFs are
required to hold mostly REITs and have little or no housing holdings. Most
REITs invest in equities involving commercial real estate (CRE), which has
dynamics that are quite different than those for residential real estate.
Though these property groups are influenced by different factors, both are
very sensitive to sudden changes in interest rates and both are subject to
higher construction and energy costs. However, most CRE markets have not been
subject to overbuilding and the improving economy, in general, has reduced
vacancies and helped increase rental rates. That said, the improving occupancy
and rental situation with most CRE properties have been modest and any
lingering affects of the noted hurricanes, such as a slowdown in the economy
reducing the demand for CRE, could reduce the profitability of commercial
properties.
Another negative issue affecting REITs
is that there is becoming less disparity between the dividends they pay (many
are now under 5%) and the yields on very secure short-term instruments. As the
yields for short term rates begin to equal or even pass some REIT yields,
there will be less incentive for investors to hold REITs for yields - after
factoring in risk due to potential prices declines. Also, equity markets
continue to feel pressure from large bankruptcy filings like Delta and Delphi
as well as reporting improprieties - most recently involving Refco. The
immediate performance of the market will likely be influenced by the overall
results of quarterly earnings now being released. However, the major concern
involves the threat of inflation and how increased raw material costs will
affect the earnings across a broad spectrum of industries.
Top
D. EQUITY REIT PERFORMANCE After a negative first quarter
drop of -8.16% and a second quarter gain of 11.46%, REITs have been challenged
to become positive in the third quarter. Up 4.89% in July, the past two months
have seen small REIT declines for August and September. Year to date (YTD),
REITs have only managed to edge out an increase of about 3%. The lone positive
property group in August was MH Parks, up 1.05%. In September, all but 4
groups were negative, with Industrial being the best performer, posting a
2.17% increase. Retail was the worst performer for both August and September,
though the different sub-groups have widely different YTD results with Malls
and Center down -20% and Regional Malls up 12%. However, the best performing
group YTD is Self-Storage, up 20.04%. Besides the noted retail group, only
Retail Center and Specialty are negative YTD, with loses of -1.47% and -3.83%.
(Please see Equity
Gainers and Losers.)
As we reported in our
last newsletter, with investors concerned over the high valuations of REITs
compared to their asset values, and the discrepancy in yields between yields
and short term rates narrowing noted above, the current environment is making
it difficult for REITs to advance. Also, if and when housing prices begin to
fall, this could create a more negative stigma towards REITs.
Top
E. LARGE CAP REIT PERFORMANCE Large Caps faired slightly
worse than the broader universe of Equity REITs in August with a loss of -5.6%
in August, but had an increase of slightly over 2% in September. Large Caps
outperformed this average for the first three quarters of the year. The only
two positive performers in August were Trizec (TRZ) and Crescent (CEI). Duke
(DRE) and Crescent topped this group in September with gains of 4.1% and 3.4%,
respectively, even though more than half the Large Caps were negative last
month. YTD, Large Caps are up over 6%, but about a third of the issues are in
negative territory. For the year, the best performers are General Growth (GGP)
and Public Storage (PSA), both up slightly more than 20%. The worst performer
YTD is i-Star Finical, with a drop of -10.7%. (Please see Large Cap
REITs.) Top
F. MORTGAGE REIT PERFORMANCE All Mortgage REIT
subgroups were negative for August and September, with the worst performer for
both months being the Mixed group. Overall, Mortgage REITs declined -5.84% and
-5.62% for August and September, respectively. YTD, this group is down
-10.68%. Though Mortgage REITs have outperformed Equity REITs for three
straight years beginning in 2001, with rates expected to rise in the near
term, it appears REITs involved with mortgages will underperform those in
equity this year. (Please see Mortgage Gainers and
Losers.) Top
G. REALTY CORPORATIONS Realty Co's. modestly
outperformed REITs each of the past three months with price changes for July,
August and September of 5.36%, -1.53% and -0.87%. YTD, Realty Co's are up
10.65% and ahead of the price appreciation for REITs. After Katrina, the need
for alternative housing in the Gulf Coast helped push Manufactured Housing
stocks up 16.7% in August and made it the best performer of only 2 other
positive groups for that month. For September, the groups were fairly equally
divided between those rising and falling. The best group last month was
Timberland, up 2.7%. The worst group for two consecutive months, with drops of
-15.2% in August and -4.3% in September, was HomeBuilders. For the year, the
best performer is Lodging, up 40.74%, followed by a 23.8% increase by Const.
& Engineering. YTD, the weakest and only negative Realty Corp. group is
HomeBuilders with a drop of -9%. The steep downward correction to Home
Builders over the past couple of months may cause some investors to look for a
slight rebound in the immediate term. However, due to higher material costs
and higher rates, as previously noted, the earnings for HomeBuilders may
become more disappointing in the coming months.(Please see Realty Corp. Gainers
and Losers.) Top
H. REAL ESTATE MUTUAL FUNDS (REMFs) For the
first quarter, REMFs have lost -6.65% compared to the broader REIT market
decline of -7.54%. REITs more than offset this loss in the second quarter and
have posted overall gains of a few percent in the third quarter. The
respective overall returns for REMFs for July, August and September are 5.75%,
0.88% and -1.44%. An important issue to keep in mind when comparing the
RealtyStocks performance to REMFs and other indices, however, is that we only
show price changes; dividends are excluded. YTD and through the third quarter,
the average overall return for a REMF is 7.3%. The best performing REMF for
the year is CGM Realty, up 21.64%, followed by EII Int'l and Alpine Int'l,
both up nearly 15%. Out of over 200 REMFs, CGM Realty was also had the best
return in September of 3%. (Please see REMFs.) Top
Stock Changes. Kimco (KIM)
and Drew Industry (DW)had 2 for 1 stock splits in late August and early
September, respectively.
Note: In reporting
group percentage changes, if a stock is under $2 for more than two months, it
is subject to removal from our coverage. All gains or losses regarding
Realty Stocks are price changes only; dividends are excluded, and are
calculated as of the end of each month.
Disclaimer: The material provided herein should not be taken as
endorsements or recommendations to invest in a stock, fund, a group of stocks
or other securities. No guarantee can be made as to the expected performance
of such investments. Investors should consult all available information,
including data external to RealtyStocks and associated Web sites, and
exercise own best judgment before making any investment decisions. The author
may have equity positions in some of the companies covered in RealtyStocks,
which may change from time to time, and will divulge such information upon
request. Top
InRealty Sponsors
Inquire about our special
advertising banner promotions!
| |